|
In this issue: |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Your e-newsletter with Innovative Solutions for the Wireless World www.comsearch.com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
November/December 2003
Vol 3 Issue 5 ©Comsearch 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access to Radio Spectrum Just Became a
Regulation of the radio spectrum has been a hotly debated subject for nearly a century, beginning in the early 1900’s when the Government passed the Radio Act of 1927 and the 1934 Communications Act, which took control of what was previously considered as “free” airwaves. Over the last 20 years, advocates for deregulation have convinced the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) to consider more flexible
approaches to spectrum management. The FCC’s recent rulemaking establishing a secondary market for spectrum usage rights represents another significant turn in this long running conversation. In 2000, the FCC adopted a Policy Statement identifying goals and principles for further development of secondary markets in spectrum usage rights. They also issued an NPRM (Docket No. 00-230) to identify steps that the FCC might take to implement their policy with respect to Wireless Radio Services and Satellite Services. The FCC wanted to modify spectrum usage
rights to allow spectrum to flow more freely among users in response to economic demand and technology advances, while being consistent with statutory mandates and public interest objectives. The FCC was concerned that existing licensees were not fully using the spectrum allocated to them. Thus, there may be large amounts of fallow spectrum in many areas, while at the same time demand for spectrum in other areas was
constrained. In the NPRM, the FCC proposed several ways to remove unnecessary regulatory barriers and clarify rules to more easily allow Wireless Radio Services licensees to lease their spectrum. It asked for comment on the types of leasing arrangements that would be desired and what responsibilities should be put on the licensee, the spectrum lessee, and the FCC. It also asked
for comment on approaches that might involve transfers of control of spectrum subject to FCC approval through a streamlined process. In 2002, the Spectrum Policy Task Force Report provided support for the secondary market initiative and spectrum leasing. The report described high demand for spectrum-based services and devices, indicating that technological advances have significantly increased the types of service offerings and contributed to increased consumer demand. The report discussed
two complimentary approaches to expand access to spectrum. The first relying on secondary market arrangements involving spectrum leasing with licensees holding the rights to determine who could have access to their exclusive-use spectrum. The second approach discussed open access to licensed spectrum for non-interfering devices - in essence, an underlay of low-power unlicensed devices such as Software-defined radio or
Ultra-wideband. The strong endorsement of the Task Force helped in the implementation of the reforms outlined in the Report and Order. The Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for “Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets” was adopted on May 15, 2003 and released on October 6, 2003. The Report and Order goes into significant detail discussing the spectrum leasing policies and providing justifications for each. The Order basically allows two types of spectrum leasing, “spectrum manager” leasing and “de facto transfer” leasing. It also goes to great lengths to try to justify that the provisions are allowable under the Communications
Act, particularly Section 310(d), and in light of the Intermountain Microwave standard of 1963 (see table of definitions below). In an attempt to cut through much of the legal language, the following table defines key terms that are used extensively in the proceedings and are critical to understanding the Report and Order.
Spectrum Manager Leasing
Some notable requirements for the “spectrum manager” leasing option include:
Although prior FCC approval is not required under this leasing option, the FCC retains the right to investigate and obtain additional information post-notification, and to terminate arrangements that it determines violate any notification certifications or public interest concerns (e.g. foreign ownership or competition concerns). The FCC plans to submit notification
certifications in an informational public notice on a weekly basis and have them publicly available in the FCC ULS database. De facto Transfer Leasing
Some notable requirements of the “long-term” de facto transfer leasing option include:
The requirements for the “short-term” de facto transfer leasing option include:
Collection of Information on Spectrum Leasing
The FCC concluded that it would like to facilitate the use of spectrum leasing among most Wireless Radio Services in which licensees hold exclusive rights to use the spectrum. It generally excluded those radio services that are “shared”, Public Safety radio services, and Guard Band service bands. The following two tables identify the included and excluded wireless services.
The second table identifies specific services that were called out in the Report and Order as excluded from the spectrum leasing options. However, any service not on the included list should be considered excluded also. Of particular note, MDS / ITFS, Satellite, Cable TV Relay, MVDDS, and 700 MHz Guard Band Manager services have been excluded, but are put into the
Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for future consideration. Users of the radio spectrum now have several new options to consider when looking for bandwidth. Licensees can consider “sub leasing” some of their spectrum holdings and conversely new potential users can look to these licensees as an alternative to the FCC for spectrum. In this new secondary market environment, it is important to remember that many of the operational and regulatory constraints and requirements remain. Liability should be a key concern especially when dealing with issues of FCC rule compliance and interference management. Implementation of an overall spectrum management plan by all parties will be critical to the success of the secondary market initiative.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Microwave Link Installation Helps Wind Energy
The increasing complexity of commercial wind power turbines requires that they be remotely controlled and monitored in order to optimize their performance and ensure that they work in concert with the overall utility power grid. This remote monitoring is often accomplished through the use of microwave links performing functions known as System Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA). As part of Comsearch’s innovative RF solutions offerings to the wind energy
industry, we entered into an agreement with one of our wind energy clients to design and install a SCADA microwave link. The role of the SCADA microwave link is extremely important for the coordination of power generated from a wind energy network. On-demand supply from the wind energy grid must be instantly available, and it is critical that the main power grid substation know the technical parameters of the wind energy power to be supplied. These parameters include, phase angle, frequency, power factor, voltage, and current and must be known precisely at
the substation so that the wind energy can be phased into the grid without creating a misalignment thus prompting a shut down. The switching-in of the power from the wind energy facility must be done in phases to avoid such a misalignment. Once the wind energy power is switched on to the electrical grid, the SCADA data provides metering of the power delivered for operational and billing purposes. While the wind energy facility is on the main grid, its output must be constantly monitored to
insure there is enough power generated to produce a net positive input to the grid. Otherwise, the wind energy grid is taken off-line either at the substation or at the wind energy O&M facility. Thus, the SCADA microwave link will connect our wind energy client’s control center and the electrical control substation facility for the electrical power grid, approximately 2.8 miles away. The link will operate in the 5.8 GHz unlicensed band and will have the capability of transferring 10 Base-T Ethernet signals in both directions on the path. A voice link included in the overhead of the radios will also be available for use. The
microwave system can have as many as twenty-four additional voice channels added to it through the addition of a channel bank. Comsearch has installed these types of microwave links in the past. The most notable of past Comsearch microwave installation projects was the emergency work performed in New York City to interconnect cell sites on wheels (COWS) for Sprint during the recovery efforts from the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center (see archived WirelessPulse article NYC
Telecom Recovery Efforts Following the Terrorist Attacks,
November 2001, Vol 1 Issue 1). In contrast to the New York City project, the wind energy installation project required a turnkey microwave link. The installation project is divided into five distinct tasks. They are:
The first step in the preliminary design is to determine the antenna heights. The results of this analysis indicate that the antenna at the substation is to be placed atop a 110-foot tower which was built just prior to the installation of the link. The antenna at
the wind energy facility side was installed on the roof of the operations and maintenance building on a 16-foot pole.
Figure 1 Microwave Path Profile
In order to specify the equipment to be installed on the path, we had to first determine the power available at the site. At the operations and maintenance building there was a 120-VAC-to-VDC converter for the radio equipment. Thus, the radio at this site will be powered from an external AC-to-DC power supply. Comsearch also selected a 120 VAC uninterruptible power supply (UPS) with at least two-hour capacity to
maintain the input AC power to the AC-to-DC power supply in the event of a power outage. At the substation there is a 48-VDC-power supply with battery backup so no UPS was required at this location. The current draw of the radios is less than 1 Amp. Table 1 Design Parameters and Reliability Calculation
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||